Review jurisdiction is limited to patent error on the record and cannot be used to reopen the merits.

Review under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 lies only for a patent, self-evident error on the face of the record or other sufficient reason of the same nature. It cannot be used to rehear the case, reappreciate evidence, or reopen merits merely because another view is possible. On the materials described, no manifest mistake in the earlier order was shown, and the challenge was treated as an attempt to revisit the merits; the review petition was therefore liable to be dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the review petition disclosed any error apparent on the face of the record or any other sufficient reason warranting review of the earlier order.

Analysis: The governing principles for review under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 require a patent, self-evident error or some other sufficient reason of like nature. Review is not a rehearing on merits, and it cannot be used to reargue the case, reappreciate evidence, or correct an alleged erroneous decision merely because another view is possible. The materials placed did not show any manifest mistake in the earlier order, and the challenge was in substance an attempt to reopen the merits of the matter.

Conclusion: No ground for review was made out; the review petition was liable to be dismissed.

---