Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of CENVAT credit on the disputed input services was admissible under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The refund claims were examined against the finding that the input services lacked nexus with the output services. The appellate authority had already relied on Tribunal decisions to hold that the disputed services were eligible input services and that refund was allowable under the substituted Rule 5 regime, subject to the prescribed conditions. No cogent reason was shown to disturb that conclusion, and the disputed credits on services with incomplete description and on travel and visa services were also found admissible on the record.
Conclusion: The refund of CENVAT credit was held not to be disallowable on the stated grounds, and the order allowing the claims was sustained against the assessee.