Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is maintainable when filed before expiry of 15 days from the date on which the notice, sent by post and returned unclaimed, is treated as received.
Analysis: The complaint under Section 138 becomes prosecutable only after the drawer fails to make payment within 15 days of receipt of the statutory notice. The Court held that where the notice is returned unclaimed, the relevant date for reckoning the statutory period is the date on which the unclaimed notice is shown by the postal endorsement as having been available for delivery, and not the date of issuance of the notice. On the admitted facts, the complaints were filed before the expiry of 15 days from the relevant unclaimed dates. The Court distinguished the decisions relied upon by the respondent and held that the cause of action had not accrued when the complaints were instituted.
Conclusion: The complaints were premature and not maintainable; the orders taking cognizance and the revisional orders were set aside, and the preliminary objection was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed before the expiry of 15 days from the relevant date of receipt or deemed receipt of the statutory notice is premature and cannot be prosecuted.