High Court directs Assessing Officer to assess returns per compromise formula, resolving lease rent and sublessee liability issues.

The High Court partially allowed the reference in favor of the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to assess the return for the year 1988-89 as per the compromise formula applied for subsequent years. This resolved the issues related to the enhanced lease rent liability and liability on enhanced rent charged to sublessees. The Court emphasized the importance of cooperation in resolving disputes and cautioned against filing frivolous objections.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of enhanced lease rent liability payable to Bombay Port Trust.
2. Disallowance of liability on account of enhanced rent charged to sublessees and assessed for tax.

Analysis:

*Issue 1: Disallowance of enhanced lease rent liability*
The Assessee, a partnership firm, disputed the increase in rent charged by Bombay Port Trust, claiming it as a contractual liability under the Mercantile System of Accounting. The Assessing Officer treated it as a contingent liability, disallowing it as a deduction. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the claim, but the Tribunal sided with the Revenue. The Tribunal noted the lack of unequivocal acceptance by the Assessee regarding the rent enhancement during the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of explicit acceptance, citing specific correspondence between the Assessee and the Port Trust. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, leading to the reference before the High Court.

*Issue 2: Disallowance of liability on account of enhanced rent charged to sublessees*
The second issue was interlinked with the first one and depended on the assessment outcome of the first issue. The High Court decided to answer the first question in favor of the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to assess the return for the year 1988-89 as per the compromise formula applied for subsequent years. Consequently, the second question did not require a separate answer, as it was contingent on the assessment outcome of the first question. The High Court partially allowed the reference in favor of the Assessee based on the above considerations.

In a related development, the High Court mentioned a settlement between Bombay Port Trust and lessees before the Apex Court, detailing the compromise reached and rates of rent applicable for the relevant period. The compromise formula was to be applied for assessing the return for the year 1988-89, as done for subsequent years. The High Court highlighted the importance of cooperation from lessees in resolving disputes and cautioned against filing frivolous objections. The judgment provided detailed directions for finalizing the settlement and appointing an Adjudicator to address any objections.

In conclusion, the High Court partly allowed the reference in favor of the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to assess the return for the year 1988-89 as per the compromise formula applied for subsequent years, resolving the issues related to the enhanced lease rent liability and liability on enhanced rent charged to sublessees.

---