Transaction value under customs law cannot be rejected on market enquiry or NIDB data alone without valid rule-based reasons.

Transaction value under the Customs valuation scheme could not be displaced merely on the basis of market enquiry or NIDB data. The text states that, under Section 14 of the Customs Act and the valuation rules, authorities must record valid rule-based reasons before rejecting the declared import value; no such reasons were shown here. Because the enhanced valuation lacked legal support, the consequential confiscation and penalties were also unsustainable. The appeal therefore succeeded and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported goods could be rejected on the basis of market enquiry and NIDB data, and whether the enhanced valuation and consequential confiscation and penalties could be sustained.

Analysis: The declared value had been proposed to be rejected under Rule 10A of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 on the basis of local market enquiry, but the adjudicating authority adopted a different method by relying on contemporaneous import data from NIDB. The relevant legal framework requires acceptance of transaction value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 unless valid reasons for rejection are recorded in accordance with the valuation rules. No such valid reasons were shown for disregarding the declared value. Market enquiry and NIDB data, by themselves, were held insufficient to displace the transaction value, and the valuation method adopted was not sanctioned by the Customs law.

Conclusion: The rejection of the declared value and the enhanced assessable value were not sustainable, and the order of confiscation and consequential penalties could not stand.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside, with consequential relief flowing to the appellant according to law.

Ratio Decidendi: Transaction value under the Customs valuation scheme cannot be rejected unless the authorities record valid rule-based reasons, and market enquiry or contemporaneous import data alone is insufficient to justify enhancement.

---