Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inland haulage charges and other CHA-related services used in connection with export of goods were eligible for refund under Notification No. 17/2009-ST dated 07.07.2009, and whether the denial of refund on the basis of reclassification as business support service was sustainable.
Analysis: The refund claims arose from services provided by the customs house agent in relation to export goods. The denial was based on treating inland haulage charges as business support service at the recipient's end and on reliance upon a circular dealing with postal mail, which was held to be inapplicable to export movements by sea. The service was found to fall within the notification entry covering services provided by a customs house agent in relation to export goods, and the reclassification adopted below was held to be incorrect.
Conclusion: The rejection of refund was unsustainable and was set aside. The matters were remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh scrutiny of the refund claims.