Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel structurals fabricated and erected at the respondent's site, after being permanently fixed to the earth, constituted excisable goods liable to duty.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the fabricated structurals retained the character of goods or became immovable property once erected. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that immovable iron and steel structures, not being goods, do not fall under Heading 73.08, and that only movable structures or parts thereof, or plates, rods, angles and similar items in prepared or pre-assembled form, are exigible. The orders below had found that the structures were permanently attached to the earth and formed part of the roof and framework of the godown, incapable of being removed or marketed as goods.
Conclusion: The fabricated and erected structurals, being permanently affixed to the earth, were not excisable goods and no duty liability arose.