TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants Cenvat Credit appeal, emphasizing invoice details.</h1> <h3>M/s. Sudtrac Linkages Pvt. Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Delhi (Faridabad)</h3> M/s. Sudtrac Linkages Pvt. Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Delhi (Faridabad) - TMI Issues:Appeal against denial of Cenvat Credit on inputs and imposition of penalty.Analysis:The appellant, engaged in manufacturing motor vehicle parts, faced denial of Cenvat Credit on inputs like H.R. Sheets due to discrepancies in the invoices, showing C.R. Sheets instead. The issue revolved around contravention of Rule 7(1)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The show cause notice led to the imposition of a penalty equivalent to the duty amount. The appellant challenged this decision before the Tribunal.The appellant's counsel cited a precedent involving Omax Autos Limited where a similar issue was addressed, and Cenvat Credit was allowed. The AR supported the impugned order. The Tribunal considered the submissions and referred to the Omax Autos Limited case, highlighting that the description discrepancy in the invoices did not negate the actual receipt of H.R. Sheets by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized Rule 7(1)(a) requirements, stating that as long as the necessary details are present in the invoice, the assessee is entitled to take Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had received the goods in question and had not procured them clandestinely. Relying on the precedent's decision, the Tribunal held that the appellant rightfully availed the Cenvat Credit, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential benefits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
