Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fly ash generated during the course of electricity generation is a manufactured excisable product liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: Fly ash arose as a by-product during combustion of coal in the captive power plant and not from any separate manufacturing process. The essential tests for levy of excise duty are manufacture or production and marketability, and both must coexist. Mere inclusion of fly ash in a tariff entry or its sale value does not create excisability when manufacture is absent. The earlier High Court decision on the same point was followed.
Conclusion: Fly ash was not liable to central excise duty.
Ratio Decidendi: Excise duty can be levied only when goods satisfy the twin requirements of manufacture or production and marketability; a by-product generated without manufacture is not excisable merely because it is marketable or placed in a tariff entry.