TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to the small scale exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003 when the brand name used on the goods belonged to a partnership concern in which the proprietor of the respondent was a partner.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether use of the brand name could be treated as use of the brand name of another person so as to deny SSI exemption. The facts showed that the respondent was a proprietary concern using a brand name associated with a partnership firm in which its proprietor had a direct interest as a partner. On those facts, the use was treated as materially indistinguishable from a situation where the user and the owner of the brand name were not strangers. The Tribunal applied the settled view that where the person using the brand name is himself a director, partner, or proprietor in the concern owning that brand, it cannot be said that the assessee is using the brand name of another person for the purpose of SSI exemption.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003, and the duty demand was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For SSI exemption, a brand name used by a proprietary concern is not treated as the brand name of another person when the proprietor has a direct proprietorial or partnership connection with the concern owning that brand name.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
