Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to interest on the amount refunded after encashment of bank guarantees in the course of provisional assessment under the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The refund claim for the amount encashed in 1998 had earlier been rejected as premature in 2008, and no appeal was filed against that rejection. The later refund of the principal amount was sanctioned without interest. The claim for interest was held to be not maintainable under the Customs Act, 1962, and the question of granting interest on equitable considerations was held to be beyond the Tribunal's powers. The cases relied upon were distinguished as arising under different statutory settings or under writ jurisdiction invoking inherent powers.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to interest. The rejection of the interest claim was upheld.