TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal emphasizes procedural rules in tax assessment; invalid notice leads to appeal dismissal.</h1> <h3>Pr Commissioner of Income Tax 3, Ahmedabad Versus Devendranath G Chaturvedi</h3> Pr Commissioner of Income Tax 3, Ahmedabad Versus Devendranath G Chaturvedi - TMI Issues:1. Validity of the block return filed after a significant delay.2. Consideration of notice under Section 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act.3. Applicability of the Hotel Blue Moon judgment in the assessment process.Issue 1: Validity of the block return:The appeal concerned a block assessment for the period from 1990 to 2001. The Assessing Officer's assessment was set aside by the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal due to the absence of a formal notice under Section 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act. The revenue argued that a letter requesting information from the assessee could be considered a notice under Section 143 (2), and the delayed return should have been treated as invalid. The revenue contended that no notice was required under Section 143 (2) if the return was invalid.Issue 2: Notice under Section 143 (2) consideration:The revenue argued that the Tribunal erred in relying on the Hotel Blue Moon judgment when the return was invalid. The revenue claimed that notice under Section 143 (2) was only necessary for a valid return. However, the assessee's counsel argued that the return was accepted by the Assessing Officer, who raised queries and framed an assessment based on the returned income. The absence of a notice under Section 143 (2) was crucial when rejecting the returned income, as per the Hotel Blue Moon judgment.Issue 3: Applicability of the Hotel Blue Moon judgment:The Tribunal clarified that the letter seeking information from the assessee was not a valid notice under Section 143 (2). Section 143 of the Act mandates a notice for assessment, and the absence of such a notice was crucial, even in the case of block assessment, as established by the Hotel Blue Moon judgment. The Assessing Officer's failure to issue a notice under Section 143 (2) before rejecting the returned income led to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal.In conclusion, the delayed block return, the necessity of a notice under Section 143 (2), and the relevance of the Hotel Blue Moon judgment were key aspects addressed in the judgment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of following procedural requirements in assessments to ensure fairness and compliance with the law.
TaxTMI 