Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transfer of acetic acid from tankers into 35 kg carbuoys amounted to manufacture under Note 11 of Chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether the exemption notifications survived for consideration if manufacture was not made out.
Analysis: Note 11 treats labelling or relabelling of containers, re-packing from bulk packs to retail packs, or any other treatment rendering products marketable to the consumer as manufacture. The goods were received in tankers, which were not bulk packs, and were thereafter transferred into smaller carbuoys. The Board's circular clarified that transfer from tankers to smaller drums is not covered by the chapter note, and the Supreme Court in an identical factual setting held that gases received in tankers were not bulk packs and that their repacking or relabelling did not amount to manufacture. Once the activity itself was held not to be deemed manufacture, the proposed duty demand could not stand and the exemption issue did not survive.
Conclusion: The activity did not amount to manufacture, and the assessee was entitled to relief.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeal was allowed and the departmental appeal was dismissed because the conversion of tanker-supplied goods into carbuoys was not a manufacturing process under the tariff note.
Ratio Decidendi: Transfer of goods from tankers into smaller containers does not amount to manufacture where the tankers are not bulk packs and the statutory note on repacking is inapplicable.