Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (6) TMI 498 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Revenue's Appeal Partly Allowed; Depreciation Disallowed, Accumulation Upheld. Unutilized Grants Remanded for Clarification. The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the disallowance of depreciation as application of income and affirming accumulation on gross ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Revenue's Appeal Partly Allowed; Depreciation Disallowed, Accumulation Upheld. Unutilized Grants Remanded for Clarification.

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the disallowance of depreciation as application of income and affirming accumulation on gross receipts. The issue of unutilized grants was remanded for further clarification, and the claim for acquisition of capital assets from borrowed funds was disallowed.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Disallowance of depreciation as application of income.
                          2. Net receipts vs. gross receipts in computation of application of income.
                          3. Treatment of unutilized grants as income.
                          4. Investment in fixed assets using loan amounts.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Depreciation as Application of Income:

                          The Revenue contended that the assessee claimed depreciation on assets, which had already been accounted for as application of income during the year of investment, leading to a double deduction. The Revenue argued that this practice was not permissible. The assessee countered by referencing Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, which exempts income derived from property held under trust for charitable purposes, provided that 85% of the income is applied towards the trust's objectives. The assessee cited various High Court judgments, including CIT v. Society of the Sisters of St. Anne, which upheld that depreciation should be allowed as it preserves the corpus of the trust. The Tribunal concluded that the issue was covered by the Karnataka High Court's judgment in Director of Income-tax, Exemptions v. Al-Ameen Charitable Fund Trust, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

                          2. Net Receipts vs. Gross Receipts in Computation of Application of Income:

                          The Revenue argued that the Assessing Officer (AO) allowed accumulation of 15% of net receipts instead of gross receipts. The CIT (A) had allowed accumulation of 15% of gross receipts. The assessee referenced the Bangalore Tribunal's decision in Jyothi Charitable Trust, which supported the accumulation at 15% on gross receipts under Section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal found no distinguishable features in the Revenue's argument and dismissed this ground, affirming the CIT (A)'s decision.

                          3. Treatment of Unutilized Grants as Income:

                          The Revenue contended that the assessee received grants from various sources for educational activities but did not utilize them, instead showing them as liabilities in the Balance Sheet. The Revenue argued that the CIT (A) decided the issue without seeking a remand report from the AO. The assessee maintained that the grants were utilized for specific purposes and separate bank accounts were maintained. The Tribunal noted that the CIT (A) should have sought a remand report from the AO to clarify the factual matrix. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT (A) to seek a remand report from the AO on the utilization and accounting of the grants.

                          4. Investment in Fixed Assets Using Loan Amounts:

                          The Revenue argued that the assessee availed loans for capital expenditure and invested in immovable properties, which should not be considered as application of income. The assessee explained that loans were taken against fixed deposits for general and capital expenditure, referencing the Karnataka High Court's judgment in CIT v. Janmabhoomi Press Trust, which allowed repayment of debt for construction as application of income. The Tribunal held that allowing the use of borrowed funds as application of income would result in double deduction, which is not permissible. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT (A) erred in allowing the claim for acquisition of capital assets from borrowed funds and allowed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the disallowance of depreciation as application of income, affirming the accumulation on gross receipts, remanding the issue of unutilized grants, and disallowing the claim for acquisition of capital assets from borrowed funds.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found