Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel items such as rebar coils, TMT bars, TMT cables and MS rebars used for laying the foundation for machinery and supporting its installation were eligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods or inputs.
Analysis: The items were used in relation to the foundation on which the machinery was installed and were therefore closely linked with the specified capital goods used for production. The settled view relied upon in the order recognises credit on steel and cement when they are integrally connected with the machinery and are not used for construction of the factory building. The exclusion from the definition of inputs for goods used for foundations and supporting structures was introduced only from 01.07.2012, whereas the disputed period was prior to that date.
Conclusion: The denial of Cenvat credit was not sustainable and the credit on the impugned items was admissible.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the assessee obtained consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used integrally for laying the foundation or support of machinery installed for manufacture can qualify for Cenvat credit when they are directly linked to the capital goods and the disputed period is prior to the later exclusion of such items from inputs.