Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit was admissible on the disputed input services, namely Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, Interior Decorator Service, Outdoor Caterer Service, Air Travel Agent Service, Tour Operator Service, Cable Operator Service and Membership of Club or Association Service.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The services allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were treated as connected with the manufacturing business, and the services denied to the assessee were held, on the basis of the cited precedents, to be similarly integrally connected with business activity and therefore eligible for credit. The reasoning adopted in the relied-on decisions was applied to the facts before the Tribunal, and no separate basis was found to sustain the departmental challenge.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was held admissible on all the disputed services, and the assessee succeeded on its appeal while the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Services used in relation to the manufacturer's business and having the requisite nexus with manufacturing activity qualify as input services for cenvat credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.