Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on input services used for renovation and modernization of a plant was admissible when the plant was subsequently used for manufacture of dutiable goods, notwithstanding that no dutiable goods were being manufactured at the time the services were received.
Analysis: The credit was denied below on the ground that, at the time of receipt of the services, the plant was not yet operational and no final products were being manufactured. The decision turned on the character and end use of the services. The services were for modernization and renovation of a plant meant for manufacture of dutiable goods, and the fact that the plant required a gestation period before commencing production did not break the nexus between the input services and the manufacture of dutiable final products. The exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was not the basis for the renovated plant's output, and the services were not shown to have been used for exempted goods.
Conclusion: The Cenvat credit was admissible and the denial was unsustainable.