Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 26(2)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be imposed for clearances made before 01.03.2007 when the provision was inserted by Notification No. 08/2007-CE(T) dated 01.03.2007.
Analysis: The penalty was imposed by invoking Rule 26(2)(ii), but that sub-rule came into force only on 01.03.2007. The clearances in question pertained to periods between 11.06.2003 and 31.05.2005, which were prior to the commencement of the provision. A penal provision inserted later cannot be applied retrospectively to earlier clearances unless the statute clearly so provides.
Conclusion: The penalty under Rule 26(2)(ii) was not sustainable for the period involved and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A penal provision introduced by a later notification cannot be retrospectively applied to past transactions in the absence of express retrospective operation.