Imported Thermal Transfer Ribbons (TTR): Tribunal Upholds Refund Decision

The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision to grant a refund of Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) paid on imported Thermal Transfer Ribbons (TTR). The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing a clear correlation between the imported goods and those sold locally after processing. The decision was supported by the High Court of Gujarat, rejecting the Revenue's appeal and affirming the refund granted to the importer based on the provided documents. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and disposed of the respondent's cross objections accordingly.

---

---

Issues:
Refund of Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) paid on imported Thermal Transfer Ribbons (TTR) - Co-relation of goods imported and sold - Eligibility for refund under Notification No. 102/2017-Cus.

Analysis:
The appeals were filed by the Revenue against the rejection of refund claims for SAD paid on TTR imported by the respondent. The adjudicating authority rejected the refund claims citing lack of co-relation between the imported goods and goods sold. The first appellate authority overturned this decision after considering all relevant documents provided by the importer. The Revenue argued that the conditions for availing benefits under Notification No. 102/2017-Cus were not fulfilled due to a change in the form of goods from jumbo rolls to smaller rolls. However, the importer contended that all necessary documents were submitted, and the first appellate authority had correctly sanctioned the refund.

The main issue was whether the importer was eligible for the refund of SAD paid at the time of importing TTR in jumbo rolls and subsequently selling them in the local market after cutting and slitting. The first appellate authority had acknowledged the documents provided by the importer, including a Chartered Engineer's certificate and domestic sales invoices, to establish the co-relation between the imported goods and those sold after VAT payment. The Tribunal referred to a previous case involving HR/CR imports and held that if goods sold after processing were subject to local VAT, the refund of paid SAD could not be denied. This decision was supported by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, leading to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal and the affirmation of the first appellate authority's decision to grant the refund.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found no merit in the appeals filed by the Revenue and rejected them. The cross objections filed by the respondent assessee were also disposed of accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of establishing a clear co-relation between imported goods and those sold after processing to determine eligibility for SAD refund, as evidenced by the documents submitted by the importer in this case.

---