Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cleaning of nullahs, removal of roadside garbage and waste soil undertaken on behalf of the municipal corporation for consideration was taxable under Business Auxiliary Service.
Analysis: The activity in question was found to be a statutory obligation of the municipal corporation and had been outsourced to the respondent. Such work was held not to be a business activity of the client and, therefore, the respondent could not be said to be rendering a service on behalf of the client within the meaning of Business Auxiliary Service. The view taken by the lower authorities was supported by the principle that performance of a sovereign or statutory function does not acquire the character of a commercial service merely because it is carried out by a private entity for a fee.
Conclusion: The activity was not taxable under Business Auxiliary Service and the demand could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on merits and the order dropping the proceedings was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: Work performed in discharge of a statutory municipal function does not amount to a commercial service on behalf of the client so as to fall within Business Auxiliary Service.