Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additional duty of customs in the form of limestone cess was leviable on import of limestone, and whether mere mining of limestone amounted to manufacture or production.
Analysis: The imported goods were assessed provisionally and the respondent sought refund of the cess paid. The levy was examined in the light of the statutory scheme under Section 3 of the Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1972, together with the charging provisions referred to in the order. The Tribunal noted that the goods were only limestone and that mere mining or excavation of limestone does not amount to manufacture or production. Reliance was placed on the view that mining activity, even with cutting or sizing before sale, does not by itself constitute manufacture or production, and that the distinction between simple extraction and conversion into lime or lime dust is material.
Conclusion: Additional duty of customs in the form of limestone cess was not leviable on the subject imports, and the refund-related relief granted below was upheld. The appeals were dismissed.