TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands case for quantifying service tax on development charges, street light charges, and road cutting charges</h1> <h3>Madhya Pradesh Audyogic Kendra Vikas Nigam India Ltd. Versus C.C.E., Indore</h3> Madhya Pradesh Audyogic Kendra Vikas Nigam India Ltd. Versus C.C.E., Indore - TMI Issues:1. Appeal against Commissioner's order confirming demand for development charges, street light charges, and road cutting charges.2. Appeal against Order-in-Original confirming demand for a different period.3. Exclusion of service tax on road cutting charges under Notification No. 24/2009-ST.4. Verification exercise for development charges and street light charges already subjected to service tax.5. Remand for quantifying service tax on development charges and street light charges.6. Confirmation of service tax demand for one year only, dropping penalty for extended period.Analysis:1. The appellant appealed against the Commissioner's order confirming a demand of Rs. 1,93,40,637/- for development charges, street light charges, and road cutting charges for the period from 16.05.2005 to 31.03.2010. Another appeal (No.59994/2013) by the same appellant was against a demand of Rs. 73,08,224/- for the period from 01.04.2010 to 30.09.2011. The appellant argued that service tax on road cutting charges should be excluded under Notification No. 24/2009-ST dated 27.07.2009.2. The appellant contended that no service tax should be levied on road cutting charges for the relevant periods as per the notification and Section 97 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, for development charges and street light charges, the appellant acknowledged the need for service tax. They claimed to have already paid service tax on some development charges under lease rent, requiring a verification exercise to avoid double taxation.3. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for quantifying service tax on development charges and street light charges. The Authority was instructed to conduct a thorough verification, considering amounts where service tax was already paid under lease rent. Following a previous CESTAT decision, the service tax demand for development charges and street light charges was confirmed for one year only, dropping the penalty for the extended period.4. The judgment allowed both appeals by way of remand, directing the Original Authority to reevaluate the matter after verification and providing a personal hearing to the appellant. The confirmation of service tax demand for only one year, along with the dropping of penalty for the extended period, was highlighted as the final decision in the case.
TaxTMI 