Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2017 (5) TMI 589 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Approval of Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 1956 The Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was sanctioned by the Delhi High Court. The Transferor Companies were ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Approval of Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 1956

                              The Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 was sanctioned by the Delhi High Court. The Transferor Companies were dissolved without being wound up, and the Transferee Company was instructed to adhere to all provisions of the Scheme and statutory obligations. The petition was granted, and the matter was resolved accordingly.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Condonation of delay in filing reports and affidavits.
                              2. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                              3. Jurisdiction of the Court.
                              4. Share capital details of the Petitioner Companies.
                              5. Pending proceedings against the Petitioner Companies.
                              6. Approval of the Scheme by the Board of Directors.
                              7. Share Exchange Ratio for the Amalgamation.
                              8. Dispensation of meetings of shareholders and creditors.
                              9. Publication of notices and citations.
                              10. Reports and objections from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director.
                              11. Compliance with statutory requirements and undertakings.
                              12. Costs payable to the Official Liquidator.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Condonation of Delay:
                              The delay of 99 days by the Official Liquidator (OL) in filing his report and 102 days by the Regional Director (RD) in filing the affidavit was condoned. The court took the report and affidavit on record and disposed of the applications accordingly.

                              2. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation:
                              The petition was filed jointly by six Transferor Companies and one Transferee Company under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation. The Scheme aimed to pool resources for beneficial utilization, achieve economies of scale, and consolidate business operations for profitability and competitiveness.

                              3. Jurisdiction:
                              The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies were situated in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, granting the Delhi High Court jurisdiction over the petition.

                              4. Share Capital Details:
                              The judgment provided detailed information on the authorized, issued, subscribed, and paid-up share capital of each Transferor and Transferee Company as of 31.03.2015.

                              5. Pending Proceedings:
                              It was averred that no proceedings were pending against the Petitioner Companies under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956, or their corresponding sections in the Companies Act, 2013.

                              6. Approval by Board of Directors:
                              The Scheme was approved by the respective Boards of Directors of the Petitioner Companies, and copies of the resolutions dated 14.01.2016 were filed on record.

                              7. Share Exchange Ratio:
                              The Share Exchange Ratio for the Amalgamation was specified as follows:
                              - 1 Equity Share of Rs. 10 each of the Transferee Company for every 4 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each held in Transferor Company No. 1.
                              - 4 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each of the Transferee Company for every 5 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each held in Transferor Company No. 2.
                              - 4 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each of the Transferee Company for every 1 Equity Share of Rs. 10 each held in Transferor Company No. 3.
                              - 1 Equity Share of Rs. 10 each of the Transferee Company for every 8 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each held in Transferor Company No. 4.
                              - 1 Equity Share of Rs. 10 each of the Transferee Company for every 2 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each held in Transferor Company No. 5.
                              - 1 Equity Share of Rs. 10 each of the Transferee Company for every 40 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each held in Transferor Company No. 6.

                              8. Dispensation of Meetings:
                              The requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors was dispensed with by an earlier order dated 10.02.2016, based on written consents/no objections from all concerned parties.

                              9. Publication of Notices and Citations:
                              Notices were issued, and citations were published in the Delhi editions of 'Business Standard' and 'Jansatta' on 14.05.2016. An affidavit confirming compliance with the publication requirement was filed.

                              10. Reports and Objections:
                              The OL's report stated no complaints were received against the Scheme, and the affairs of the Petitioner Companies were not prejudicial to members, creditors, or public interest. The RD's affidavit mentioned pending scrutiny and a small outstanding demand against Transferor Company No. 4, but stated no objection to the Scheme subject to these observations. The Transferee Company undertook to defray all liabilities, including pending income tax assessments.

                              11. Compliance and Undertakings:
                              The court directed the Petitioner Companies to comply with all statutory requirements and file an undertaking to take over all liabilities of the Transferor Companies. The Transferee Company was also required to file an undertaking within two weeks to defray all liabilities.

                              12. Costs to Official Liquidator:
                              The Petitioner Companies were directed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- as costs in the Common Pool Fund maintained by the Official Liquidator, Delhi, considering the extensive examination of records and prioritised hearings.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Scheme of Amalgamation was sanctioned under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Transferor Companies were dissolved without being wound up. The Transferee Company was directed to comply with all provisions of the Scheme and statutory requirements. The petition was allowed and disposed of accordingly.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found