Transaction value can be rejected where foreign customs documents conclusively match imports and the importer fails to substantiate declared value.

Imported goods that can be conclusively matched with supplier export documents obtained from foreign customs authorities may justify rejection of the declared transaction value when the importer cannot substantiate that value with supporting evidence. Here, the bills of entry were correlated with the foreign export records by bill of lading number, container number, supplier name, quantity and description, and the authenticity of those records was not disputed. As the importer failed to produce material evidence after the valuation query, the re-determination of assessable value on the basis of those documents was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported goods could be rejected and the assessable value re-fixed on the basis of export documents obtained from the foreign customs authorities.

Analysis: The imported consignments were found to match the supplier's export documents obtained through the foreign customs authorities, including details such as bill of lading number, container number, supplier name, quantity, and description of goods. The importer did not dispute the correlation of those documents with the goods covered by the bills of entry, and the authenticity of the documents was not doubted. Once the Department raised a query under Rule 10A of the Customs Valuation Rules, the importer failed to produce material evidence to support the declared value of $400 per MT.

Conclusion: The rejection of the transaction value and re-determination of value on the basis of the foreign customs documents was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are conclusively correlated with supplier documents obtained from foreign customs authorities and the importer fails to substantiate the declared value, the transaction value may be rejected under the customs valuation rules.

---