TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns duty payment decision, stresses legal precedents.</h1> <h3>J.B.M. Auto Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata</h3> J.B.M. Auto Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata - TMI Issues:- Availing and utilization of Cenvat Credit for payment of duty- Debiting and reaccrediting the amount irregularly- Adjudication confirming demand, interest, and penalty- Appeal dismissal by Commissioner (Appeals)- Contesting demand on merits and limitation- Reference to legal decisions- Applicability of Larger Bench decision- Tribunal's consideration and allowance of appealAnalysis:The case involves the appellant availing and utilizing Cenvat Credit for duty payment and purchasing raw materials from their units. Subsequently, irregular utilization led to debiting and reaccrediting the amount from their PLA account. The Revenue deemed the re-credit irregular and inadmissible, resulting in a demand of &8377; 227,165, interest, and penalty, confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the dismissal of the appeal.The appellant contested the demand on merits and limitation, citing legal decisions like Neptune Industries, Sopariwala Exports Pvt. Ltd., Ballarpur Industries Ltd., and Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd. The appellant argued against the demand, while the Revenue relied on the BDH Industries Ltd. case, emphasizing the Larger Bench decision.The Tribunal analyzed the issue, noting the lack of recurring effect and the decision in Sopariwala Exports Pvt. Ltd., where the appeal was allowed based on the Larger Bench's consideration. The Tribunal discussed the Motorola India Pvt. Limited case, highlighting the discrepancy in the Larger Bench's decision and the High Court's ruling. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant's appeal.The judgment emphasizes the importance of legal precedents, the interpretation of relevant case laws, and the application of legal principles in resolving disputes related to Cenvat Credit utilization and reaccreditation. The detailed analysis showcases the Tribunal's thorough consideration of legal arguments and precedents to reach a just decision in favor of the appellant.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
