Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent-assessee's VCES declaration was liable to be rejected on the ground that an enquiry was pending against it on the relevant date.
Analysis: The communication issued by the DGCEI merely called for a wide range of documents for several financial years without disclosing any specific transaction, query, or matter under enquiry. The reference to Section 14 of the Central Excise Act did not convert the exercise into a specific enquiry, and the communication was treated as one issued in the nature of a roving enquiry. The Board Circular dated 25.11.2013, being clarificatory, supported acceptance of the declaration in such circumstances. The later show cause notice could not be relied upon to defeat a declaration already filed. The precedent relied upon by the Revenue was held distinguishable on facts.
Conclusion: The declaration was not liable to be rejected, and the Tribunal's view accepting the declaration was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A VCES declaration cannot be rejected merely because a broad document-requisition notice has been issued; unless a specific enquiry is shown to be pending, a roving and unspecific requisition does not attract rejection of the declaration, and binding circulars must be followed by departmental .