Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants bank appeal, orders reassessment, acknowledges TDS compliance efforts, emphasizes timely info submission</h1> <h3>State Bank of India, Ongole Versus ITO (TDS), Ward-3 (3), Guntur</h3> The Tribunal allowed the public sector bank's appeal, directing the assessing officer to re-examine the case and recalculate deductions. The bank's ... TDS deducted but not remitted into government account - Short deduction of TDS - assessee in default u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) - Held that:- We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the assessee being a public sector bank normally comply with TDS as per the provisions of the Act. As claimed by the assessee, its TDS aspect has been taken care by centralised core banking system, which will automatically deduct TDS as per the provisions of the Act. Though, there are few technical issues, like nons-ubmission of declaration forms within due date, the same cannot be a valid reason for treating the assessee as an assessee in default u/s 201(1) of the Act, particularly when assessee explains the reasons for such mistakes. We further observe that the assessee has furnished all details and requested for one more opportunity to explain its case. Therefore, keeping in view overall facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to remit the issue back to the file of the A.O. and direct the A.O. to examine the case with reference to the details furnished by the assessee and re-compute the short deduction of tax, TDS deducted but not remitted into government account and interest as per the provisions of the Act. Needless to say, the assessee is directed to furnish the necessary information without seeking any adjournments. Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Issues:Assessment of short deduction of tax at source, TDS deducted but not remitted into government account, and interest on short deduction of TDS and delay in remittance of TDS to government account.Analysis:The case involved an appeal by a public sector bank against the order of the CIT(A) pertaining to the assessment year 2012-13. A survey revealed irregularities in the bank's TDS compliance for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12. The assessing officer initiated proceedings under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bank explained the discrepancies, attributing them to issues such as non-furnishing of PAN numbers by depositors and delays in remittance due to staff shortages. The assessing officer determined the bank as an assessee in default for non-compliance of TDS provisions.The CIT(A) upheld the additions made by the assessing officer, as the bank failed to appear or provide justifications during the hearings. The bank, in its appeal, argued that the demand determination was erroneous, emphasizing that TDS compliance was managed by the core banking system. The bank requested an opportunity to furnish additional details to rectify the discrepancies.After hearing both parties, the Tribunal found merit in the bank's arguments. It acknowledged the bank's efforts to comply with TDS provisions through the centralised core banking system. Despite technical issues like delayed submission of declaration forms, the Tribunal deemed it inappropriate to treat the bank as an assessee in default. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to re-examine the case based on the bank's submissions and recalculate the deductions in accordance with the law.Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of furnishing necessary information promptly. A stay application for the outstanding demand was dismissed as the appeal had been resolved. The Tribunal's decision aimed to ensure fair assessment and compliance with TDS regulations while providing the bank with an opportunity to rectify any errors.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the complexities of TDS compliance issues faced by the public sector bank and the legal proceedings that ensued to address the discrepancies identified during the survey operation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found