TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether courier charges incurred for export consignments were eligible for refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST; (ii) Whether GTA services used for movement of export goods from the factory/ICD to the port of export were eligible for refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST read with CBEC Circular No. 120/01/2010-ST dated 19/01/2010; (iii) Whether service tax paid on certification and other export-related services provided by Wig Air Freight Pvt. Ltd. was refundable.
Issue (i): Whether courier charges incurred for export consignments were eligible for refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST.
Analysis: The invoices showed that the appellant was the consignor, the consignee was located in the United States, and the documentation reflected shipment details, bill of lading particulars, freight components, terminal handling charges, export customs clearance charges, and service tax. These particulars established that the courier charges were incurred in the process of export of the manufactured goods.
Conclusion: The courier charges were held eligible for refund in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether GTA services used for movement of export goods from the factory/ICD to the port of export were eligible for refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST read with CBEC Circular No. 120/01/2010-ST dated 19/01/2010.
Analysis: The invoices showed that the services were received for transport of goods to the export point and were integrally connected with the export transaction. The notification, read with the circular, was applied to treat such GTA services as eligible services for refund.
Conclusion: The GTA services were held eligible for refund in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether service tax paid on certification and other export-related services provided by Wig Air Freight Pvt. Ltd. was refundable.
Analysis: The sample invoices indicated that the services were in the nature of certification and certificate of origin and were relevant to export. They were treated as services received in the course of export and therefore within the refund entitlement under the notification.
Conclusion: The service tax paid on such export-related services was held refundable in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The refund claim was substantially upheld and the adjudicating authority was directed to recalculate the admissible refund and grant it with interest in accordance with the rules.
Ratio Decidendi: Services demonstrably used in the course of export, and supported by export-linked documentation, qualify for refund where the governing notification and circular permit such treatment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
