Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable on the amount relatable to molasses cleared for captive consumption when the assessee was manufacturing dutiable and exempted final products and had reversed proportionate CENVAT credit under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The clearance of molasses for captive use did not, in the facts of the case, amount to a duty default attracting interest. The dispute had already been settled in the assessee's own case that molasses was a common input for manufacture of both rectified spirit and denatured spirit. Once proportionate credit was reversed in terms of Rule 6, the assessee satisfied the condition attached to Notification No. 67/95-CE. The amount sought to be treated as duty on molasses was in substance only the Rule 6 reversal, and interest could not be levied on that basis.
Conclusion: Interest demand was unsustainable and was rightly set aside; the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are used in the manufacture of both exempted and dutiable final products and the assessee reverses proportionate credit as required under Rule 6, the amount so reversed is not to be treated as delayed duty payment on the inputs so as to attract interest.