TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Travel Expenses Disallowed, Business Loss Set Off Against LTCG</h1> <h3>Chemito Technologies P. Ltd. Versus DCIT– 7 (3), Mumbai</h3> Chemito Technologies P. Ltd. Versus DCIT– 7 (3), Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of travel expenditure of Rs. 6,78,893.2. Set off of business loss against LTCG under section 71(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Issue 1: Disallowance of Travel Expenditure of Rs. 6,78,893:The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of scientific and chemical engineering equipment, filed its return for A.Y. 2010-11 with a declared loss. The assessment under section 143(3) determined the loss differently. The appellant challenged the disallowance of travel expenses and the adjustment of long term capital gains against business loss before the CIT(A)-13, who dismissed the appeal. The appellant then appealed, arguing the expenses were wholly for business purposes. However, a Coordinate Bench decision for A.Y. 2009-10 involving similar travel expenses ruled against the appellant. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contentions, citing the Coordinate Bench's decision, and dismissed the appeal on the disallowance of travel expenses.Issue 2: Set off of Business Loss against LTCG:The appellant contested the CIT(A)'s decision to set off business loss against LTCG under section 71(2) of the Act. The appellant acknowledged a Coordinate Bench decision in a different case that ruled against a similar claim. The Tribunal examined the provisions of section 71(2) and referenced the Coordinate Bench's decision in the case of Sumaria Appliances Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal held that the appellant had no option to carry forward business loss without setting it off against capital gains, as per the clear language of the provision. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on this ground, aligning with the Coordinate Bench's interpretation. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on the set off of business loss against LTCG.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal for A.Y. 2010-11, upholding the disallowance of travel expenses and the set off of business loss against LTCG as per the provisions of section 71(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 