CENVAT credit for statutory compliance services allowed, with catering credit limited to the burden actually borne by the assessee.

CENVAT credit on outdoor catering services was allowed only to the extent the service tax burden was actually borne by the assessee; amounts recovered from employees or others were ineligible, and this principle applied both before and after 1.4.2011. Credit on garden maintenance and sewage treatment plant services was allowed because those services were required to meet statutory environmental and consent conditions for operating the port, making them business-related input services. Penalty was set aside as the dispute turned on interpretation of law, while interest was to be recalculated in accordance with the applicable period and law.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on outdoor catering services to the extent the expenditure was borne by the assessee and not recovered from employees or other persons, including for the period before and after 1.4.2011; (ii) Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on garden maintenance services and maintenance of sewage treatment plant services where such activities were required for compliance with statutory environmental conditions for operating the port; (iii) Whether interest and penalty were liable to be sustained.

Issue (i): Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on outdoor catering services to the extent the expenditure was borne by the assessee and not recovered from employees or other persons, including for the period before and after 1.4.2011.

Analysis: Credit relating to canteen or outdoor catering services provided in compliance with statutory requirements was treated as permissible, but only to the extent the service tax element was actually borne by the assessee. The portion recovered from employees was not eligible. The same principle was applied both for the period prior to 1.4.2011 and for the period after the amendment to the definition of input services, since the taxable burden retained by the assessee remained the relevant factor.

Conclusion: Credit on outdoor catering services was allowed only to the extent borne by the assessee, and disallowed to the extent recovered from employees or others.

Issue (ii): Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on garden maintenance services and maintenance of sewage treatment plant services where such activities were required for compliance with statutory environmental conditions for operating the port.

Analysis: The assessee produced material showing that operation of the sewage treatment plant and related gardening or recycling requirements formed part of the consent conditions imposed by the pollution control authority and were necessary for lawful operation of the port. Services incurred to satisfy such statutory obligations were treated as business-related and not as optional or purely personal activities.

Conclusion: Credit on garden maintenance services and sewage treatment plant services was allowable.

Issue (iii): Whether interest and penalty were liable to be sustained.

Analysis: For interest, the applicable rule position was to be applied according to the relevant period, and the liability was left to be worked out by the adjudicating authority in accordance with law. For penalty, the dispute was held to be one of interpretation of statutory provisions, making the case fit for relief under the waiver provision invoked by the assessee.

Conclusion: Penalty was set aside, and interest was directed to be modified in accordance with the applicable law.

Final Conclusion: The demands were substantially set aside, with relief granted on the principal credit disputes and penalty, while the outdoor catering credit was retained only to the extent of the service burden actually borne by the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: CENVAT credit is admissible for services incurred to satisfy statutory operating requirements, but only to the extent the incidence of the service is borne by the assessee and not recovered from others; penalty may be waived where the dispute turns on interpretation of law.

---