Appeal success: disallowance under Section 14A remanded for reevaluation.

The appeal challenged the addition of reimbursement of expenses to an associated enterprise and disallowance under section 14A. The tribunal upheld the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for the current year but directed examination of the deduction in the subsequent year. The controversy over determining the arm's length price was not adjudicated as it did not affect the assessed income. Regarding the disallowance under section 14A, the matter was remanded for reevaluation, and the appellant succeeded for statistical purposes. The appeal was allowed with directions for reevaluation of disallowances in subsequent years.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition on account of reimbursement of expenses to AE as per order of Transfer Pricing Officer.
2. Disallowance u/s 14A.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Addition on account of reimbursement of expenses to AE:
The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2008-09 and challenges an order by CIT(A) upholding the Transfer Pricing Officer's adjustment of Rs. 2,26,10,000 to income for reimbursement of expenses to an associated enterprise. The Transfer Pricing Officer determined the arm's length price at nil, leading to the addition in the assessment. The Assessing Officer also disallowed the corresponding expenditure under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS. The appellant contended that the Transfer Pricing Officer exceeded jurisdiction and argued for reevaluation under section 37(1) of the Act. Additionally, the appellant stated that the TDS was deducted in the subsequent year, requesting allowance in that year. The tribunal upheld the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for the current year but directed examination of the deduction in the subsequent year. The controversy over determining the arm's length price was not adjudicated as it did not affect the assessed income due to the disallowance under section 40(a)(i).

Issue 2: Disallowance u/s 14A:
The second issue concerns the disallowance made under section 14A of the Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 12,02,115 under Rule 8D(2)(iii), which was affirmed by CIT(A). The appellant relied on a Tribunal decision to exclude Strategic Investments while recomputing the disallowance under section 14A. The Departmental Representative had no objection, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation. Consequently, the appellant succeeded on this issue for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reevaluation of disallowances in subsequent years as per law.

---