Court affirms ITAT's decision on revenue expenditure, directs reversal of depreciation. Commissioner's appeals dismissed.

The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, allowing the respondent's claimed expenditure as revenue expenditure. The court directed that any depreciation taken on the allowed expenditure should be reversed by the assessing authority. The appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax were dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allowance of expenditure claimed as revenue expenditure.
2. Claiming depreciation on interest expenditure.
3. Reversal of depreciation if taken on allowed expenditure.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Allowance of expenditure claimed as revenue expenditure
The main issue in this case revolved around the allowance of expenditure claimed by the respondent as revenue expenditure. The respondent, a public limited company, had incurred an expenditure of &8377; 3,37,84,348/- towards payment of interest on loans and other items for setting up an industry. The respondent initially capitalized the amount but later claimed it as revenue expenditure. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the claim only for the interest amount paid on loans but disallowed other expenditures like financial charges and professional expenses. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, allowing the expenditure on interest and other connected items. The High Court also supported this decision based on a precedent from the Gujarat High Court.

Issue 2: Claiming depreciation on interest expenditure
The appellant argued that the respondent should not be allowed to claim depreciation on the interest amount treated as revenue expenditure. However, the court noted that there was no evidence on record to show that the respondent had actually claimed depreciation on this amount. The court directed that if the respondent had indeed claimed depreciation on the interest and other items treated as revenue expenditure, the assessing authority should reverse the depreciation accordingly.

Issue 3: Reversal of depreciation if taken on allowed expenditure
In conclusion, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to allow the expenditure claimed by the respondent as revenue expenditure. The court directed that if the respondent had taken any depreciation on the allowed expenditure, it should be reversed by the assessing authority. With these observations, the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax were dismissed, and the court listed other appeals for hearing in the following week.

---