ITAT upholds decisions in favor of NBFC, dismisses Revenue's appeal on debt write-off & interest disallowance

The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal in both issues, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions. The first issue involved the deletion of a debt written off by the assessee, a NBFC, amounting to Rs. 3,41,87,613. The second issue concerned the disallowance of interest under Rule 8D(2)(ii) for tax-free dividend income, amounting to Rs. 3,91,97,029. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions in both instances, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Deletion of claimed debt written off by the assessee.
2. Disallowance of interest under Rule 8D(2)(ii) for tax-free dividend income.

Issue 1: Deletion of claimed debt written off by the assessee:
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of a debt written off by the assessee, a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), amounting to Rs. 3,41,87,613. The AO rejected the claim stating it was not a sundry debtor and interest was not accounted for in previous years. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal, citing provisions of section 36(1)(vii) and section 36(2) of the Act. The ITAT noted that the debt was taken into account in the income of the assessee for relevant assessment years, fulfilling the conditions specified in the Act. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 2: Disallowance of interest under Rule 8D(2)(ii) for tax-free dividend income:
The Revenue challenged the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 3,91,97,029 under section 14A of the Act. The AO computed the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii), whereas the assessee disallowed a sum as per Rule 8D(2)(iii). The Ld. CIT(A) relied on the fact that the net interest income was positive, and no net interest expenditure was incurred. Referring to a Kolkata Tribunal decision, the Ld. CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee. The ITAT concurred, stating that Rule 8D(2)(ii) cannot be applied when there is no net interest expenditure, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal in both issues, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions.

---