Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of service tax paid on input services used for export of goods was admissible when the exports were made under drawback claim, and whether the amendment introduced by the later notification affected the entitlement for exports made after its date.
Analysis: The refund scheme under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. initially denied refund where goods were exported under drawback claim. The subsequent amendment by Notification No. 33/2008-S.T. withdrew that restriction. Since the record indicated that part of the exports in some matters, and the entire period in one matter, fell after the later notification, the objection based solely on drawback claim could not sustain a blanket denial of refund. The entitlement had to be examined with reference to the relevant export period and the supporting documents.
Conclusion: The objection to refund on the ground of drawback claim was not sustainable for the period after the amendment, and the matters were required to be reconsidered period-wise by the original authority.