Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether butter flavouring was correctly ified under CTH 2106 90 60 instead of CTH 3302 10 90.
Analysis: The product was examined on the basis of the chemical test report, which showed that the sample was anhydrous milk fat in oily liquid form and that classification under Chapter 33 was ruled out. Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 33 required the product to answer the statutory description applicable to odoriferous substances of plant origin, whereas the imported butter flavouring was not of plant origin. No material was produced to displace the test report. The cited precedent was found to concern different facts and a different product.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classified under CTH 2106 and not under CTH 3302, and the classification in favour of Revenue was upheld.