TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court: Excise duty incentives surplus not repayable to Govt, credit indefeasible post valid claim</h1> <h3>Commr. of C. Ex., Noida Versus New Holland Tractors (India) Pvt. Ltd.</h3> Commr. of C. Ex., Noida Versus New Holland Tractors (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2017 (347) E.L.T. 7 (All.) Issues:Central Excise Appeal under Section 35G against the order dated 13-5-2011.1. Whether incentives allow collecting more excise duty than paid, requiring deposit with the GovtRs.2. Should the party be vigilant as per the law's provisionsRs.Issue 1:The first issue pertains to whether incentives granted to the appellant permit them to collect excise duty exceeding what they paid and if they are obligated to deposit the surplus amount with the Government. The Court referenced a Division Bench's decision of the Uttarakhand High Court, emphasizing that a manufacturer immediately obtains credit for excise duty paid on raw materials upon receipt, and there is no provision for reversal of credit by the excise authorities. The Court highlighted that the excise duty credit is indefeasible once validly taken, and there is no time limitation for its utilization unless the manufacturer chooses not to use the raw material in the excisable product. The judgment concluded that the questions of law in this appeal are resolved against the department and in favor of the assessee.Issue 2:The second issue revolves around whether the party should exercise vigilance and care in their actions and business nature as per the legal provisions. The Court did not delve into this issue in detail in the judgment, as the primary focus was on the interpretation of the excise duty credit rules and the obligations of the appellant regarding the collection and payment of excise duty. Consequently, the judgment did not provide an extensive analysis or specific ruling on the vigilance aspect raised in the second question.In conclusion, the High Court of Allahabad delivered a judgment in a Central Excise Appeal concerning the collection and payment of excise duty by the appellant. The Court relied on precedents and legal provisions to establish that excise duty credit is immediately available to manufacturers upon receipt of raw materials, and once validly taken, the credit is indefeasible without any time limitation for utilization. The judgment favored the assessee, dismissing the appeal against the department. The Court did not extensively address the issue of vigilance raised in the second question but focused primarily on the interpretation of excise duty credit rules and obligations regarding the collection and payment of excise duty.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
