Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal upholds deletion of disallowances, citing commercial expediency. Lower income assessment for assessee.</h1> <h3>DCIT, Cir. 2, Surat Versus M/s. Eurotex Chemicals</h3> DCIT, Cir. 2, Surat Versus M/s. Eurotex Chemicals - TMI Issues involved:Challenge to deletion of disallowance in respect of various expenditures made by the AO.Analysis:1. The Revenue appealed before the Tribunal against the order of the ld.CIT(A)-III, Surat for the Asstt.Year 2009-10. The Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowance of various expenditures made by the AO.2. The AO had disallowed commission, salary expenses, and partner salary, resulting in a higher computed income for the assessee. However, the ld.CIT(A) deleted all these disallowances, leading to a lower income assessment.3. The Tribunal considered the basic principles required to assess expenditure claimed by an assessee for business purposes under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal referred to judgments emphasizing commercial expediency and business needs while determining expenditure allowance or disallowance.4. The Tribunal analyzed the disallowances made by the AO regarding commission payments, salary expenses, and partner salary. The AO disallowed commission payments based on general practices without specific defects, which the ld.CIT(A) rightly deleted. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of salary expenses and partner salary, emphasizing that such decisions should align with business requirements.5. The Tribunal upheld the ld.CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowances, considering the factual circumstances, the assessee's submissions, and the application of relevant legal provisions. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the deletion of disallowances made by the AO.6. The judgment pronounced on 3rd April 2017 at Ahmedabad concluded the appeal, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue's challenge against the deletion of disallowances.