Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made towards unexplained investment in gold jewellery and silver found during search was sustainable, and to what extent credit could be allowed for jewellery held by the assessee and family members under the CBDT jewellery guidelines.
Analysis: The assessee's claim based on earlier wealth-tax declarations was not fully accepted. The Tribunal applied the CBDT circular on non-seizure of jewellery and followed its earlier view that credit can be given only to the extent of the jewellery quantum normally attributable to specified family members. The circular was held to cover gold jewellery alone and not silver. On that basis, only limited relief was warranted, and the unexplained silver addition remained justified.
Conclusion: The addition was sustained in part. Relief was granted only to the extent of 650 grams of gold jewellery attributable to the assessee and family members, and the balance addition remained undisturbed.