Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on goods used for erection of a dedicated transmission line exclusively supplying electricity to the appellant's factory.
Analysis: Electricity was essential for manufacture of cement and the transmission line was undisputedly erected for the appellant's exclusive use. The duty-paid goods were used for laying the dedicated line and the credit was denied mainly on the ground that the transmission line was immovable property and outside the factory premises. That reasoning was rejected as immovability by itself is not a valid ground to deny credit where the items are used in relation to manufacture and satisfy the user test. The reasoning also drew support from the fact that the dedicated line had an immediate and functional nexus with the manufacturing activity by ensuring uninterrupted supply of power to the factory.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the goods used in the dedicated transmission line was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable.