TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate tribunal quashes defective show cause notice in Service Tax case, stresses need for specific allegations</h1> <h3>State Bank of India, Roorkee Road, Meerut Cantt., Meerut Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut.</h3> State Bank of India, Roorkee Road, Meerut Cantt., Meerut Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut. - TMI Issues:- Allegations in show cause notice regarding Service Tax payment- Defects in show cause notice- Adjudication of the case- Appeal decision and penalties imposedAllegations in Show Cause Notice Regarding Service Tax Payment:The issue in this appeal revolved around the validity of the show cause notice issued without specific allegations of short payment/non-payment of Service Tax. The notice was based on intelligence from DGCEI, Bangalore, indicating that a bank was providing services related to the operation of accounts of EPFO without paying Service Tax. The State Bank of India had allegedly not discharged its Service Tax liability on the services provided to EPFO, leading to the issuance of the notice. However, upon scrutiny, it was found that the notice lacked crucial details and failed to establish a clear accusation against the appellant. The information provided was incomplete and not sustainable, leaving the appellant unaware of the specific allegations against them.Defects in Show Cause Notice:The appellate tribunal found that the show cause notice was defective as it did not include or attach the contents of the letter from DGCEI dated 21.01.2009, which was crucial for understanding the basis of the allegations. Additionally, the notice lacked a copy of the information received from EPFO or any other source, rendering it vague and mechanically issued without proper application of mind. The tribunal highlighted that there were no specific allegations regarding incorrect filing of returns or any reference to the State Bank of India's accounting records. Due to these deficiencies, the tribunal deemed the show cause notice as untenable and set it aside, granting relief to the appellant.Adjudication of the Case:The show cause notice was adjudicated earlier, resulting in a reduced amount being confirmed as Service Tax short paid along with interest, and penalties imposed under relevant sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant then appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals), who upheld the demand and penalties but set aside one of the imposed penalties. However, upon further review by the appellate tribunal, it was determined that the initial show cause notice was defective and lacked essential details, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.Appeal Decision and Penalties Imposed:After considering the arguments and examining the records, the appellate tribunal concluded that the show cause notice was flawed and not sustainable due to its incomplete and vague nature. As a result, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law, highlighting the importance of providing clear and specific allegations in legal notices to ensure a fair and transparent adjudication process.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
