Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on inputs used by a job worker in manufacture under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. is admissible when the finished goods are cleared without payment of duty to the supplier of raw material.
Analysis: The notification makes the principal manufacturer legally liable to discharge excise duty on the job-work goods. On that basis, the goods manufactured by the job worker cannot be treated as exempted goods. The denial of credit on inputs used in such manufacture is therefore unsustainable. The issue is covered by the Larger Bench decision relied upon in the record, and the same view has been consistently followed in the cited decisions.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was admissible and the revenue's challenge failed.