Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether PSC girders and horizontal members manufactured and used in the flyover project were eligible for exemption as goods manufactured at the site of construction under the relevant excise notifications. (ii) Whether scrap and waste generated during fabrication of the exempted goods were also entitled to exemption.
Issue (i): Whether PSC girders and horizontal members manufactured and used in the flyover project were eligible for exemption as goods manufactured at the site of construction under the relevant excise notifications.
Analysis: The exemption applied to goods falling under Heading 68.07 when manufactured at the site of construction for use in construction work at such site. The contract and correspondence showed that the casting yard and manufacturing premises were identified as part of the project site, and the NHAI and its engineers had access to that place. The location was also near the construction site, and the Board Circular explaining the expression "site" was satisfied. The absence of a formal allotment of land by the principal did not defeat the exemption where the manufacturing activity was carried on in terms of the contract and for the project alone.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 3/2001-CE and Notification No. 6/2002-CE was admissible to the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether scrap and waste generated during fabrication of the exempted goods were also entitled to exemption.
Analysis: Once the principal goods were held to be exempt, the scrap and waste arising in the course of their fabrication followed the same exempt treatment as an incidental consequence of the exempt manufacturing activity.
Conclusion: The scrap and waste were also covered by the exemption under Notification No. 85/95-CE.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge to the grant of exemption failed, and the order granting relief to the assessee was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the contract and surrounding materials show that the manufacturing premises form part of the project site and are available for access and use in the construction work, the site-based exemption is available even without a formal allotment of land by the project owner.