Tribunal upholds 2% rate for commission income based on turnover in bank account

The Tribunal determined that commission income should be based on turnover in a specific bank account. The 2% rate for estimating commission income was upheld. Revenue appeals were allowed, and assessee appeals were partly allowed, limiting turnover to one bank account. The AO was directed to calculate income at 2% of turnover in that account for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, totaling Rs. 2,04,23,897/- and Rs. 37,48,108/- respectively. The decision was issued on 15th March 2017 in Ahmedabad.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legitimacy of commission income from Vishal Traders.
2. Validity of the assessment of commission income at a specific rate.
3. Calculation of turnover and estimation of commission income.
4. Dispute over the handling of transactions in various bank accounts.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Legitimacy of Commission Income from Vishal Traders
The assessee was engaged in the business of supplying foodgrains on a commission basis and also acted as a canvassing agent. During a survey under section 133A of the Income Tax Act, it was revealed that Vishal Traders was issuing bogus bills. The assessee admitted to working as a commission agent for Vishal Traders, receiving cheques, depositing them, and withdrawing cash to hand over to Shri Madanlal L. Shah. The assessee did not dispute this modus operandi or the earning of commission income in this clandestine manner.

Issue 2: Validity of the Assessment of Commission Income at a Specific Rate
The Assessing Officer (AO) calculated the commission income at 2% of the total deposits made in the bank accounts of Vishal Traders, resulting in an addition of Rs. 67,79,780/- for the Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] reduced the estimation of income from 2% to 1% for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10 but confirmed the 2% rate for AY 2007-08. The assessee challenged the computation of turnover and the estimation of income, while the Department challenged the reduction of the rate from 2% to 1%.

Issue 3: Calculation of Turnover and Estimation of Commission Income
The AO tabulated the turnover of Vishal Traders from different bank accounts and concluded that the total deposits represented bogus sales. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's findings but reduced the commission rate to 1% for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Tribunal found that the assessee admitted to handling transactions only in the Mehsana Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. and not in other banks. Therefore, the commission income should be assessed based on the turnover in the Mehsana Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. for the relevant years.

Issue 4: Dispute Over Handling of Transactions in Various Bank Accounts
The assessee argued that he only handled transactions in the Mehsana Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. and not in other banks. The CIT(A) and AO assumed the assessee's involvement in all transactions of Vishal Traders based on circumstantial evidence. However, the Tribunal found no conclusive proof that the assessee handled transactions in other banks and thus limited the assessment to the Mehsana Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. account.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the commission income should only be assessed based on the turnover in the Mehsana Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. The rate of 2% for estimating the commission income was deemed reasonable. Consequently, the appeals of the Revenue were allowed, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed to the extent of limiting the turnover to the Mehsana Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. account. The Tribunal directed the AO to compute the income at 2% of the turnover in this specific bank account for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, amounting to Rs. 2,04,23,897/- and Rs. 37,48,108/- respectively. All appeals were allowed, and the order was pronounced on 15th March 2017 in Ahmedabad.

---