Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit was admissible on saree guards cleared along with motorcycles and scooters.
Analysis: The saree guard was held to be a statutorily required safety device under Rule 123 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. Since the vehicle could not be sold as a complete finished product without the protective device, and its cost was included in the assessable value of the vehicle, the item was treated as necessary for marketability. The reasoning followed the view that the definition of input is wide enough to cover goods forming part of the marketable final product, and the same principle was applied to the saree guard.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on saree guard was admissible and the disallowance was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An item that is statutorily required, cleared along with the final product, and necessary to render the final product marketable can qualify as an input for cenvat credit purposes.