Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reversal of the entire Cenvat credit with applicable interest entitled the appellant to the abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006 for Mandap Keeper service.
Analysis: The appellant had taken Cenvat credit during the relevant period and was, at the time of adjudication, ineligible for the abatement. However, the entire disputed credit was subsequently reversed along with interest. On that basis, the earlier availment was treated as having no continuing effect, and the condition attached to the notification was considered satisfied. The notification benefit was therefore not to be denied merely because the credit had initially been taken, once it stood fully reversed.
Conclusion: The appellant was held eligible for the abated rate of tax under Notification No. 01/2006-ST, and the denial of the exemption was set aside.