Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Cenvat credit was admissible on stock of processed fabrics manufactured before 1-5-2001 and cleared thereafter on payment of ad valorem duty, notwithstanding the special procedure under Rule 96ZNA and the amended notifications.
Analysis: The appellant had manufactured the goods before 1-5-2001 and the stock remained lying as on 30-4-2001. Rule 96ZNB(7)(a) excluded only goods manufactured or produced prior to 1-5-2001 and cleared on or after that date from the special procedure. The benefit of the amended paragraph 4A in Notification No. 7/2001-C.E. (N.T.) applied only where the manufacturer availed the special procedure prescribed under Rule 96ZNA and paid the specified sum of duty under Rule 96ZNC. Since the goods in question were cleared under the old ad valorem method and not under that special procedure, denial of deemed credit was not justified. The issue stood covered by the cited precedent and the same reasoning applied.
Conclusion: Deemed Cenvat credit was admissible and the demand, penalty and consequential interest could not be sustained.