Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the orders reversing input tax credit under Section 19(16) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were liable to be quashed for want of item-wise discrepancy details and adequate opportunity, and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The notices proposing reversal referred generally to discrepancies between Annexures I and II, but the item-wise particulars forming the basis of the proposed reversal were not furnished in a manner enabling an effective reply. Though an opportunity and later an additional period were granted, the assessee was not in a position to place the collected records before the authority before the impugned orders were passed. Since the very basis for reversal depended on verification of the alleged discrepancies, the absence of a meaningful opportunity to meet the proposal justified interference. The Court also directed that, on remand, the authority must issue notice, permit production of records, and if discrepancies still appear, afford a personal hearing with departmental assistance for verification.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remitted to the respondent for reconsideration, with directions to afford a further opportunity to the assessee and to proceed afresh after verification.