Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be imposed in the absence of intention to evade payment of excise duty and where the shortage found on stock verification was explained as a clerical mistake.
Analysis: Section 11AC is attracted only when there is an intention to evade duty. The Tribunal had recorded findings that the shortage detected during stock verification stood explained, that the duty had been deposited without protest before issuance of the show-cause notice, and that there was no material to support clandestine removal of goods. These findings of fact negatived the basis for invoking the penalty provision.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 11AC was not leviable.