Tribunal grants relief to assessee on carry forward business losses vs. capital gains, depreciation set off

The Tribunal allowed the respondent assessee's appeal concerning the set off of brought forward business losses against deemed short term capital gains and unabsorbed depreciation without the 8-year carry forward restriction. The decisions were based on interpretations of relevant tax laws and previous court rulings, including Digital Electronics Ltd. v/s. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax and General Motors India (P.) Ltd. v/s. Dy. CIT. The appeals were dismissed as the issues had been previously settled in favor of the respondent assessee, with no costs awarded.

---

---

Issues:
1. Set off of brought forward business loss against deemed short term capital gains.
2. Set off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation without the restriction of 8 years carry forward.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Set off of brought forward business loss against deemed short term capital gains
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the respondent assessee regarding the set off of brought forward business losses against deemed short term capital gains arising from the sale of building, plant, and machinery. This decision was based on the interpretation of Section 72 of the Income Tax Act, which allows the carry forward of losses under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession' to be set off against profits of any business or profession, without the requirement that such gains or profits must be taxable under the same head. The Tribunal relied on the decision in Digital Electronics Ltd. v/s. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax 49 SOT 65 to support this interpretation. The Revenue accepted the decision in Digital Electronics Ltd., and no distinguishing features were presented to justify a different view. Consequently, the question of law regarding this issue was not entertained, and the appeal was dismissed.

Issue 2: Set off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation without the restriction of 8 years carry forward
The impugned order allowed the respondent assessee's appeal on this issue by following the decision of the Gujarat High Court in General Motors India (P.) Ltd. v/s. Dy. CIT 354 ITR 244. The Court also considered the decision in CIT v/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (2016) 72 taxman.com 325, where the Tribunal's view, based on the Gujarat High Court decision, was upheld. The Circular no.14 of 2001 dated 22nd November, 2001 clarified that the restriction of eight years for carrying forward and setting off unabsorbed depreciation was dispensed with effect from Assessment Year 2002-03. Therefore, the unabsorbed depreciation available on 1st April, 2001 would be allowable from the Assessment Year 2002-03 onwards. As the issue was already decided in favor of the respondent assessee by the decision in Hindustan Unilever Ltd., the question of law proposed did not arise, and thus was not entertained. The appeal was ultimately dismissed with no order as to costs.

---